Quantcast
Channel: Manhattan Institute
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 39

Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

$
0
0

Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

Background

The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, originally known as the International Center for Economic Policy Studies, was founded in 1978 by Anthony Fisher and William Casey and in recent years has promoted climate science contrarianism while defending policies supporting the development of fossil fuels.

Anthony Fisher was influencial in the formation of several other think tanks, including the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, the Fraser Institute, and the London-based Institute of Economic Affairs. William Casey later became President Ronald Reagan's CIA director. [1] The stated mission of the New York-based Manhattan Institute “is to develop and disseminate new ideas that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.” [2]

According to the Manhattan Institute's website, the think tank “produces ideas that are both literally and figuratively outside the Beltway. We have cultivated a staff of senior fellows and writers whose provocative books, essays, reviews, interviews, speeches, and op-ed pieces communicate our message and influence the debate.” [2]

The Manhattan Institute has contended that it is “unclear” whether human activity is causing global climate change: “Despite the certitude with which the media and politicians treat the issue, the science remains muddled.” [6]

Robert Bryce & the Manhattan Institute

Media Matters reports that Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Robert Bryce regularly authors op-eds for mainstream and conservative publications advocating against renewable energy while promoting fossil fuel use.  [47]  With reference to climate change, Bryce has said: “I don't know who's right. And I don't really care.”[50] In a Wall Street Journalop-ed titled “Five Truths About Climate Change”, Bryce claimed that the “science is not settled, not by a long shot.”[51]

Center for Energy Policy and the Environment (CEPE)

The Manhattan Institute previously maintained a section of their website titled the Center for Energy Policy and the Environment (CEPEwhich “seeks to influence today’s energy policy debate by developing and advancing ideas rooted in free-market economic principles.” The Center no longer appears to be in operation. [3]
 

The Manhattan Instituted listed the following “experts” at CEPE
[3]

Stance on Climate Change

2015

“The United States is not running out of energy. It is time to appreciate the staggering economic and geopolitical benefits that the development of our vast hydrocarbon resources can bring. It is no overstatement to say that jobs related to extraction, transport, and export of hydrocarbons can awaken the United States from its economic doldrums and produce revenue such that key national needs can be met—including renewal of infrastructure and investment in scientific research.”[5]

2007

“To what degree are human-induced greenhouse gases responsible for warming the atmosphere? The answer is unclear. Despite the certitude with which the media and politicians treat the issue, the science remains muddled. Temperatures fluctuate: they go up in some regions, down in others, and may be affected by naturally occurring phenomena, such as El Niño.” [6]

September 6, 2000

“No-one doubts that carbon dioxide has increased in the earth's atmosphere profoundly over the last hundred years. Almost everything else, however, is in doubt. Do greenhouse gasses make the earth warmer? It's hard to say because eighty percent of the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere followed, but did not precede the increase in the surface temperature that has been measured over the last hundred years. If it caused the increase in temperature, it's an odd pattern of causality, where the cause follows the effect.” [4]

Funding

The following funding data is based on data collected from the Conservative Transparency Project and Media Matters. [7][9]

View the attached spreadsheet for additional information on Manhattan Institute funding by year (.xlsx).  Note that not all contribution data has been verified by DeSmogBlog for accuracy. [45]

OrganizationTotal
John M. Olin Foundation$6,779,500
The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation$6,076,560
Sarah Scaife Foundation$4,615,000
Searle Freedom Trust$3,486,000
Smith Richardson Foundation$2,797,977
William E. Simon Foundation$2,511,200
Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation$2,100,000
Gilder Foundation$1,180,300
Ravenel and Elizabeth Curry Foundation$1,146,000
Jaquelin Hume Foundation$1,000,000
Paul E. Singer Foundation$925,000
F.M. Kirby Foundation$857,500
Donors Capital Fund$841,770
DonorsTrust$748,500
William H. Donner Foundation$747,500
Earhart Foundation$600,000
Walton Family Foundation$546,525
The Carthage Foundation$693,000
Exxon Mobil$495,000
The Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation$475,000
Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation$464,300
John Templeton Foundation$459,000
Mercer Family Foundation$434,225
The Galbraith Foundation$365,855
The Randolph Foundation$327,375
Hickory Foundation$241,200
JM Foundation$240,000
Stuart Family Foundation$168,957
Castle Rock Foundation$165,000
PhRMA$155,000
Lovett and Ruth Peters Foundation$130,000
Robert W. Wilson Charitable Trust$120,000
Friedman Foundation For Educational Choice$108,000
Chase Foundation of Virginia$88,200
Armstrong Foundation$79,500
Abstraction Fund$76,000
The Weiler Foundation$57,500
CIGNA Foundation$50,000
David H. Koch Charitable Foundation$50,000
John William Pope Foundation$50,000
Arthur N. Rupe Foundation$48,400
Pierre F. and Enid Goodrich Foundation$40,000
State Policy Network$30,000
Diana Davis Spencer Foundation$25,000
Scaife Family Foundation$25,000
The Challenge Foundation$25,000
The Robertson-Finley Foundation$24,000
The Roe Foundation$18,500
Holman Foundation$15,000
Ruth & Lovett Peters Foundation$15,000
The Rodney Fund$10,000
Cato Institute$7,000
Lowndes Foundation$5,000
Sidney A. Swensrud Foundation$5,000
Stiles-Nicholson Foundation$5,000
The Vernon K. Krieble Foundation$2,500
The Gordon and Mary Cain Foundation$2,000
Lynn & Foster Friess Family Foundation$1,000
Tepper Family Foundation$1,000
Grand Total$42,756,844

Exxon Funding

Greenpeace's ExxonSecrets reports that the Institute has received $635,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998[8]

In February, 2012, Gabe Elsner at the Checks and Balances Project asked Robert Bryce about his funding from fossil fuel interests, Bryce refused to answer the question. DeSmogBlog reported here[12][13]
Gabe Elsner explains: 
“I asked Bryce if he had financial ties to the fossil fuel industry after his debate appearance before the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners conference on Monday. Not only did Bryce refuse to answer the question, he also launched into an angry, finger-pointing tirade saying that I’d 'made up' the amount of fossil fuel support documented by Manhattan Institute records.”
Video below: 
Gabe Elsner has also launched TrueTies.org (designed by Checks and Balances Project) and a petition by 50 journalists echoing the call for The New York Times to lead the industry by creating a disclosure policy for op-ed contributors. Media Matters additionally compiled a comprehensive page on Bryce's ties to the fossil fuel industry. [47]

Koch Funding

According to Greenpeace, The Manhattan Institute received $2,660,062 from Koch foundations between 1999 and 2015[10]

*Original tax forms prior to 1997 are no longer available for verification. If you include $25,000 in fundingfor each 1986 and 1987, the grand total jumps to $2,710,062 in Koch funding from 1986 to 2015. [10]

YearCharles Koch FoundationCharles Koch InstituteClaude R. Lambe Charitable FoundationDavid H. Koch Charitable FoundationGrand Total
1986*$25,000$25,000
1987*$25,000$25,000
1999$25,000$25,000
2001$100,000$100,000
2003$200,000$200,000
2004$200,000$200,000
2005$200,000$200,000
2006$200,000$200,000
2007$200,000$200,000
2008$200,000$200,000
2009$200,000$200,000
2010$200,000$200,000
2011$200,000$200,000
2012$100,000$175,000$275,000
2013$198,000$198,000
2014$166,300$15,200$181,500
2015$56,362$24,200$80,562
Grand Total$520,662$39,400$2,100,000$50,000$2,710,062

Tobacco Industry Funding

SourceWatch found that the Manhattan Institute has sought funding from tobacco companies including Brown & Williamson. The Institute received funding from R.J. Reynolds and in 1991, Lorillard, Inc. budgeted a $4,000 contribution to the Manhattan Institute and contributed the same amount in 1996. Philip Morris budgeted $25,000 for the Institute in 1995. [11]

990 IRS Tax Forms

Key People

Board of Trustees

(* denotes Former Trustee)

Name2012[17]2015 [14]2016[48]
Andrew CaderY
Ann J. ChartersY
Anthony P. ColesY
Bruce G. WilcoxY
Charles H. BrunieYYY
Clifford S. AsnessY
Daniel LoebY
David MalpassY
Dietrich WeismannYY
Donald G. ToberY
Fleur HarlanY
Harvey GolubY
Jay H. NewmanY
Kathryn S. WyldeY
Kenneth B. GilmanY
Kenneth M. GarschinaY
Lawrence J. MoneYYY
Maurice R. GreenbergY
Michael J. FedakYYY
Nathan E. Saint-AmandYY
Nick OhnellY
Paul E. SingerYYY
Ravenel CurryY
Rebekah MercerY
Richard Gilder*YYY
Robert RosenkranzY
Rodney NicholsY
Roger Hertog*YYY
Roger KimballYY
Sean M. FielerY
Thomas W. SmithYY
Timothy G. Dalton, Jr.Y
William KristolY
Andrew CaderYY
Ann J. ChartersYY
Ravenel CurryYY
Timothy G. Dalton, Jr.YY
Sean M. FielerYY
Kenneth M. GarschinaYY
Kenneth B. GilmanYY
Harvey GolubY
Maurice R. GreenbergYY
Fleur HarlanYY
Roger KimballY
William KristolYY
Daniel LoebY
Rebekah MercerY
Jay H. NewmanYY
Rodney NicholsYY
Nick OhnellY
Robert RosenkranzYY
Thomas W. SmithY
Donald G. ToberY
Bruce G. WilcoxY
Kathryn S. WyldeYY
Peter M. FlaniganY
Frank J. MacchiarolaY
Clifford S. AsnessY
Daniel LoebY
Thomas F. McwilliamsY
Nathan E. Saint-AmandY
Donald G. ToberY
Bruce G. Wilcox Y

Recently-Deceased Trustees

Name2015[14]2016[48]
Dietrich WeismannY
Frank J. MacchiarolaYY
Peter M. FlaniganYY
William Tell,  Jr.YY

Manhattan Institute Staff

Name2012[18]2015[15]2016[52]Description
Aaron RicksYOnline Content Editor
Abigail SalvatoreYCommunications Associate
Alan FensterYYYResearch Assistant
Alex ArmlovichYYPolicy Analyst
Alison S. MangieroYYSenior Director, Adam Smith Society
Alissa YiYYManager, Operations & Conferences, Adam Smith Society
Antonio RiveraYEquipment Manager
Ben BoychukYYAssociate Editor, City Journal
Brian AndersonYYYEditor, City Journal
Carolyn GormanYProject Manager
Casimer CraneYDevelopment Associate
Charles SahmYYYDirector, Education Policy
Charlyce BozzelloYProgram Officer, Adam Smith Society
Dan GearyYYYSenior Development Officer
David KimbleYYManaging Editor, Publications
Dean BallYYPolicy Manager, State & Local Policy - Strategic Manager
Debbie EzzardYYYEvents Coordinator
Diana Furchtgott-RothYSenior Fellow & Director, Economics21
Howard DickmanYExecutive Managing Editor
Howard HusockYYYVice President, Research & Publications
Isaac GorodetskiYYDirector, State & Local Policy
Jack SoloweyYProject Manager, Health Policy
James CoplandYYYSenior Fellow & Director, Legal Policy
James VelasquezYEditorial Manager
Jamie MeggasYSenior Graphic Designer
Jared MeyerYFellow
Jennifer TannerYWeb Designer
Jessica PerryYYYDirector, Development
Joanna FarandaYYOffice Manager, Development
Katherine LazarskiYYSenior Media Manager
Lawrence J. MoneYYYPresident
Leigh HarringtonYYVice President, Communications & Marketing
Leonard SadoskyYCommunications Manager, Adam Smith Society
Margaret O'KeefeYProject Manager, Proxy Monitor
Marilou DavidYYYController
Marin SchlossbergYDevelopment Officer, Membership & Events
Matt ToyerYYDeputy Director, Development
Matthew HennesseyYYYAssociate Editor, City Journal
Michael BarreiroYYYVice President, Operations
Michael DotsikasYYYDirector, IT
Michael ToscanoYYDevelopment Officer, Policy Initiatives
Michele JacobYYDirector, Media Relations
Molly M. HarshYYDirector, Programs, Adam Smith Society
Patricia RondinelliYYYAssistant to the President
Paul BestonYYYManaging Editor, City Journal
Paul HowardYYYSenior Fellow & Director, Health Policy
Peter PappasYYYAssociate Director, IT
Preston CooperYPolicy Analyst, Economics21
Rafael MangualYProject Manager, Legal Policy
Rebecca CalhounYProject Coordinator, NYC Initiative
Rebecca SidialYReceptionist
Robert SherwoodYYBroadcast Outreach Manager
Sarai MasonYAssistant to the Controller
Seth BarronYProject Director, NYC Initiative
Taisha CamachoYYYEvent Director
Tatyana KustasYYYDirector, Web Services
Troy SenikYVice President, Policy & Programs
Vanessa MendozaYYYExecutive Vice President
Yevgeniy FeymanYFellow and Deputy Director, Center for Medical Progress
Nichole AdrianYDevelopment Officer
Judah BellinYAssociate Editor
Stephen EideYSenior Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership
Leslie GonzalesY Receptionist
Natalie NakamuraYCommunication Associate
Elaine RenYYSenior Graphic Designer
AntonioRiveraYY
Michael AllegrettiYDirector, Center for State and Local Leadership.
Bridget CarrollYPress Officer.
Chantilly CobbYEditorial Assistant.
Lindsay Young CraigYVice President, Communications & Marketing.
Timothy HoeferYDirector, Empire Center for New York State Policy.
Jaclyn KielyYDevelopment Officer.
Mary Ellen MillettYOffice Manager, Empire Center.
Raymond NiemiecYPress Officer.
Matthew OlsenYPress Officer.
Ben PlotinskyYManaging Editor, City Journal.
Alison SmithYDirector, Center for the American University.
Clarice SmithYDirector, Media Relations.
Kasia ZabawaYDeputy Director, Communications.

Manhattan Institute Experts

Name2012[19]2015[16]2016[49]Description
Aaron M. RennYSenior Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Adam WhiteYYAdjunct Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Andrew von EschenbachYChairman, Project FDA.
Ben BoychukYYYAssociate Editor, City Journal.
Brian C. AndersonYYYEditor, City Journal.
Charles SahmYYDirector, Education Policy.
Diana Furchtgott-RothYYYSenior Fellow. Director, Economics21.
E. J. McMahonYSenior Fellow
Edward L. GlaeserYYYSenior Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Fred SiegelYYYSenior Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
George L. KellingYYYSenior Fellow
Guy SormanYYYContributing Editor, City Journal.
Heather Mac DonaldYYYThomas W. Smith Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Howard HusockYYYVice President, Research & Publications. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Isaac GorodetskiYDirector, State and Local Policy.
Jacob L. VigdorYAdjunct Fellow.
James R. CoplandYYYSenior Fellow. Director, Legal Policy.
Jared MeyerYYFellow
Jason L. RileyYSenior Fellow.
Jim ManziYSenior Fellow
John TierneyYContributing Editor, City Journal.
Josh B. McgeeYYSenior Fellow
Judith MillerYYYAdjunct Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Kay S. HymowitzYYYSenior Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Lawrence J. MoneYPresident.
Mark P. MillsYYSenior Fellow
Max EdenYSenior Fellow
Michael Knox BeranYYYContributing Editor, City Journal.
Myron MagnetYYYEditor-at-Large, City Journal
Nicole GelinasYYYSenior Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal.
Oren CassYYSenior Fellow
Paul HowardYYYSenior Fellow. Director, Health Policy.
Peter D. SalinsYYYSenior Fellow.
Richard A. EpsteinYYYVisiting Scholar
Robert BryceYYYSenior Fellow
Scott WinshipYYWalter B. Wriston Fellow
Sol SternYYYContributing Editor, City Journal.
Stephanie HesslerYYYAdjunct Fellow
Steven MalangaYYYSenior Fellow. Senior Editor, City Journal.
Ted FrankYYYAdjunct Fellow
Theodore DalrympleYYYDietrich Weismann Fellow. Contributing Editor, City Journal
Tom CoburnYAdvisor, Project FDA.
Victor Davis HansonYYYContributing Editor, City Journal.
Yevgeniy FeymanYYFellow. Deputy Director, Health Policy.
Rick BakerYYAdjunct Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership (St. Petersburg
Claire BerlinskiYYContributing Editor, City Journal (Paris
Lester BrickmanYYVisiting Scholar, Center for Legal Policy (New York City)
Charles W. CalomirisYAdjunct Fellow, Manhattan Institute (New York City)
Daniel DisalvoYYSenior Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership (New York City)
Richard C. DreyfussYAdjunct Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership (Pennsylvania)
Stephen D. EideYSenior Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership (New York City)
Andrew C. Von EschenbachYChairman, Project FDA (New York City)
Richard GreenwaldYYAdjunct Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership (Newark
Peter W. HuberYYSenior Fellow, Center for Medical Progress 
Stefan KanferYYContributing Editor, City Journal
Andrew KlavanYYContributing Editor, City Journal (Los Angeles
Joel KotkinYYContributing Editor, City Journal (California)
John LeoYYSenior Fellow, Center for the American University (New York City)
Herbert LondonYYSenior Fellow, Center for the American University (New York City)
James ManziYYSenior Fellow, Manhattan Institute (Boston
Edmund J. McmahonYYSenior Fellow, President
John H. McwhorterYYContributing Editor, City Journal (New York City)
James PieresonYYSenior Fellow, Director
Aaron RennYSenior Fellow and Contributing Editor, City Journal (New York City)
Peter ReinharzYYContributing Editor, City Journal (New York City)
Jason RileyYSenior Fellow, Manhattan Institute (New York City)
Avik RoyYYSenior Fellow, Manhattan Institute (New York City)
Harry SteinYYContributing Editor, City Journal (New York City)
William J. SternYYContributing Editor, City Journal (New York City)
Jacob VigdorYYAdjunct Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership (North Carolina)
Marcus WintersYYSenior Fellow, Center for State and Local Leadership (New York City)
Luigi ZingalesYYContributing Editor, City Journal (Chicago)
Christopher PapagianisYManaging Director, e21.
Russel SykesYSenior Fellow, Empire Center for New York State Policy.

Actions

June, 2016

The Manhattan Institute (MI) released a report titled “Missing Benefits, Hidden Costs: The Cloudy Numbers in the EPA's Proposed Clean Power Plan” (PDF). [57]

There are few benefits, which have been massively overestimated, and huge costs, which have been massively underestimated […] from a cost benefit perspective, there’s simply no justification for the EPA’s Clean Power Plan,” reads the report. [57]

The MI contends that the Clean Power Plan will have “will have no measurable impact on world climate. And if those emissions reductions have no measurable impact on world climate, they will not have any measurable impact on world GDP, either.” [57]

The report's author, Jonathan A. Lesser, is president of Continental Economics and “has over 30 years of experience working for regulated utilities, government, and as an economic consultant.”  [57]

May 4, 2016

The Manhattan Institute released a report titled “What Happens to an Economy When Forced to Use Renewable Energy?” (PDF) written by Robert Bryce. [58]

Bonner R. Cohen promoted the new study at the Heartland Institute. He writes that policies to combat climate change in Europe “have led to soaring electricity costs for residential and commercial customers, leading the authors to recommend the United States reject similar policies.” [59]

“To avoid the kinds of results seen in Europe, U.S. policymakers at the federal and state levels should be required to do rigorous cost-benefit analyses before imposing renewable-energy mandates,” Robert Bryce said. “U.S. policymakers must also consider the impact higher energy costs will have on overall employment and industrial competitiveness.” [59]

April, 2016

Oren Cass authored a Manhattan Institute report titled
Who Pays the Bill for the Obama Climate Agenda?” (PDFclaiming that “President Obama’s climate agenda represents an enormous tax increase on low- and middle income Americans, nearly tripling the federal tax burden on the poorest households.” [55]

“[T]he policy pays only lip service to 'action' on climate change and will not affect the trajectory of global greenhouse-gas emissions or temperatures,” Cass claims.  [55]

October 16, 2015

The Manhattan Institute's Center for Energy Policy and the Environment released a report titled “Leading Nowhere: The Futility and Farce of Global Climate Negotiations” (PDF) on the Paris COP21 Climate Change negotiations. [53] Oren Cass, MI senior fellow, suggests that “The U.S. Congress should pass a resolution preemptively rejecting any agreement that omits enforceable developing-nation commitments to emissions reductions or that transfers substantial wealth to the developing world.” [54]

“Whatever ineffectual 'deal' may emerge from the Paris talks will only underscore what has been true all along: no negotiated agreement will significantly reduce global emissions of CO2. The U.S. Congress should pass a resolution preemptively rejecting any agreement that omits enforceable developing-nation commitments to emissions reductions or that transfers substantial wealth to the developing world. Constraining the options in Paris to either a genuine and enforceable agreement, or no agreement, will have a valuable, clarifying effect on the future of international climate policy,” Cass writes. [53]

August, 2015

The Manhattan Institute has strongly opposed President Obama's Clean Power Plan. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, senior fellow and director of Economics at the Manhattan Institute writes in the National Review that the Clean Power Plan as “a way of punishing the states that did not vote for Obama.” [20]
In the same article, Furchtgott-Roth questions whether carbon dioxide should be mitigated:
“The question to ask is why any of this is necessary. […] Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Everyone breathes it out every day. It even helps the growth of trees and other greenery.” [20]
Oren Cass, another senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute (who also served as Mitt Romney's domestic policy adviser during the 2012 presidential campaign), describes the Clean Power plan in a statement republished at Politico New York:
“It is an illegal overreach that claims power never given to the E.P.A. and bullies both states and private businesses. […] Its primary effects will be to disrupt markets and drive up costs, handing victories to politically-favored 'green' industries and sending the bill to consumers.” [21]
Cass also went on the On Point radio show in  Boston to discuss the Clean Power Plan. Audio below.

July, 2015

The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research released a report titled “Less Carbon, Higher Prices:  How California’s Climate Policies Affect Lower-Income Residents” (PDF).  [22]
The report suggests that renewable energy sources have caused electric prices to rise, leading to “energy poverty” in low income households. They suggest that California should do a cost-benefit analysis of renewable energy sources, and poses the question:
“Do the benefits of California’s proposed GHG reductions—which, even if realized, will negligibly affect global emissions and climate—outweigh their considerable and rising cost to local businesses and households, particularly low-income Californians?”
Report authors Robert Bryce and Jonathan Lesser discussed their report in The Orange County Register:
“In short, California's renewable energy mandates and climate change policies may make wealthy coastal residents feel virtuous, but those policies are having a disproportionate economic impact on the poor,” they write. [23]
The Manhattan Institute Report was heavily promoted in Conservative media, and has appeared in numerous papers and other sources including Investors Business DailyFox & Hounds, and the Breitbart

June 22, 2015

The Manhattan Institute's Robert Bryce wrote a column in the National Review titled “The Poor Need More Energy: What BP Knows and Pope Francis Doesn’t,” where he  maintained that the best, low-cost energy source for developing countries is coal. [24]
According to Bryce, “[Pope Francis's] new encyclical on climate change, Laudato Si’ (Be praised), shows a shallow understanding of global energy use and, in particular, of how energy consumption is soaring among the people he claims to care most about: the poor.” 
“But if developing countries are going to prepare for possible changes in the climate, they will have to get richer so they can afford to deal with any calamities that may occur. And how will they get richer? The answer is obvious: by consuming more energy. And for countries throughout the developing world, the lowest-cost energy is still coal,” Bryce writes. [24]

September 18, 2014

DeSmogBlog reports how Lisa Murkowski (AK) and Tim Scott (SC) worked with the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research to fashion a white paper opposing the EPA's new power plant emissions standards. [25]
According to The Hill, a representative from Murkowski’s office said that the Senators will be speaking about “the economic, political, and social consequences of allowing energy insecurity to rise in America.” [26] 
The paper put forward the theory that government regulations and environmental safeguards are costing American consumers too much money and destroying jobs. Murkowski and Scott introduced the paper at a September 18 Manhattan Institute event titled “Is Energy Insecurity on the Rise in America?” [27]

July 7, 2013

Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth published an article in The Globe and Mail titled “Quebec tragedy reminds us pipelines are safest way to transport oil” that pushing to speed up the Keystone XL pipeline after an oil train explosion. [29]
“After Saturday’s tragedy in Lac-Mégantic, Que., it is time to speed up the approval of new pipeline construction in North America. Pipelines are the safest way of transporting oil and natural gas, and we need more of them, without delay,” she wrote.
DeSmogBlog reports that Furchtgott-Roth has been advocating on behalf of the oil industry in one form or another for more than 25 years. She has also worked as an economist at the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the industry-funded American Enterprise Institute (AEI). [30]

August, 2011

According to records on file at the Center for Media and Democracy's (CMD) SourceWatch, Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Paul Howard, spoke at the 2011 American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) Annual Conference in a Workshop titled “Rationing By Any Other Name: Medicare's Independent Payment Advisory Board.” [11]

CMD offers the following description of the American Legislative Exchange Council:

ALEC is a corporate bill mill. It is not just a lobby or a front group; it is much more powerful than that. Through ALEC, corporations hand state legislators their wishlists to benefit their bottom line. Corporations fund almost all of ALEC's operations. They pay for a seat on ALEC task forces where corporate lobbyists and special interest reps vote with elected officials to approve 'model' bills.”

More information is available at ALECexposed.org

June 7, 2011
Robert Bryce, the Manhattan Institute's Senior Fellow for their “Center for Energy Policy and the Environment” ran an Op-Ed in The New York Times titled “The Gas Is Greener.” [31]
DeSmogBlog reports how Bryce suggests that fracked shale gas and nuclear are more environmentally preferable energy options to solar and wind power. Bryce had published a similar article in the Wall Street Journal earlier that week. DeSmog also notes how the New York Times failed to state the “clear conflict of interest” of the fossil-fuel funded Manhattan Institute. [32], [33]
Bryce's argument was debunked by the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), which points out a number of factual errors and omissions in the Manhattan Institute representative's piece. Climate Progress also debunked Bryce's claims in detail. [34]
After DeSmogBlog initially contacted The New York Times regarding these conflicts of interest, the Checks and Balances Project picked up the issue, using Bryce as an example of the “disturbing trend of special interests surreptitiously funding 'experts' to push industry talking points in the nation's major media outlets.” DeSmogBlog further reported on this issue here. [36]

April, 2009

The Manhattan Institute has released multiple editions of its report “Energy and the Environment: Myths and Facts” by Drew Thornley. Its second edition was released in April, 2009. 

The report includes a list of “myths” including how “Humans are the main drivers of the greenhouse effect which is likely to cause global warming.” [37]

According to the Institute's press release (PDF), “Thornley concludes that policymakers should focus on energy policies based on facts that meet our needs today without creating liabilities for us tomorrow.” [38]

The executive summary for the report describes it as a “primer for educators, journalists, and public officials—for concerned citizens generally.” [39]

April 10, 2008

The Manhattan Institute hosted “the skeptical environmentalist,” Bjorn Lomborg, for a speech in New York City, DeSmogBlog reported. [40]

2005

Sponsored THEBOTTOMLESSWELL: The Twilight Of Fuel, The Virtue Of Waste, And Why We Will Never Run Out Of Energy by Manhattan Institute senior fellow Peter W. Huber and by Mark P. Mills. [41]

The book argues that the “quantity of raw fuel matters less to energy security than our ability (both technological and political) to extract the fuel. In this passage, they make the counter-intuitive point (one of many in this book) that energy consumption, rather than limit our supply of energy, actually increases it.”[42]

Manhattan Institute Contact & Location

The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research listed the following contact information in its website as of May, 2016: [56]

Manhattan Institute
52 Vanderbilt Ave.
New York, NY 10017
(212) 599-7000

Related Organizations

Resources

  1. The Manhattan Institute,” Spectrum Policy: Property or Commons? Accessed May 13, 2012. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7WQlY

  2. About the Manhattan Institute,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived September 3, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/JmaXj

  3. About the Center for Energy Policy and the Environment,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived September 3, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/kLvyE

  4. “Public Policy and the Media: Do We Get the Whole Story?” (Transcript), Manhattan Institute Annual James Q. Wilson Lecture, September 6, 2000. Archived September 3, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/WaP9Z

  5. Manhattan Institute's Power & Growth Initiative,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived September 5, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/KoPX0

  6. Max Schulz. “MYTH 9: GLOBALWARMINGHASACCELERATEDINTHEPASTFIFTYYEARS,” Energy & The Environment: Myths & Facts (manhattan-institute.org). Archived September 5, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/lOazl

  7. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research,” Conservative Transparency. Accessed September 3, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/92anm

  8. ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Manhattan Institute. Accessed September, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/E0pwL

  9. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research,” Media Matters. Archived June, 2012. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mQPz2

  10. The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research: Koch Industries Climate Denial Front Group,” Greenpeace. Archived March 13, 2017.Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/cjugc

  11. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research,” SourceWatch profile. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/dHD9

  12. Gabe Elsner. “Anti-Clean Energy ‘Pundit’ Unhinged By Basic Question: Are You Bankrolled By Fossil Fuels?” The Checks and Balances Project, February 9, 2012. Archived September 4, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/a4Pn3

  13. Brendan DeMelle. “Accountability Moment: Manhattan Institute's Robert Bryce Squirms And Evades Question on Fossil Fuel Funding,” DeSmogBlog, February 9, 2012. 

  14. Manhattan Institute Board of Trustees,” Manhattan Institute. Archived September 4, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Mt9Zo

  15. Manhattan Institute Staff Directory,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived September 4, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/nTuAJ

  16. Manhattan Institute Experts,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived September 4, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ZiPb4

  17. Manhattan Institute Board of Trustees,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived May 10, 2012. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/oV9Bq

  18. Manhattan Institute Staff Directory,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived May 10, 2012. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/0lucL

  19. Manhattan Institute Experts,” Manhattan Institute for Public Policy. Archived May 4, 2012. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/AH9Np

  20. Obama’s ‘Clean Power Plan’ Punishes Workers, Consumers, and States That Voted for Romney,” National Review, August 10, 2015. Archived September 5, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/BKON6

  21. Scott Waldman. “Obama emissions plan has roots in New York debate,” Politico New York, August 4, 2015. Archived September 5, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/c99pr

  22. Jonathan A. Lesser. “Less Carbon, Higher Prices:  How California’s Climate Policies Affect Lower-Income Residents” (PDF), Manhattan Institute, July, 2015. Archived September 5, 2015. 

  23. Robert Bryce and Jonathan Lesser. “Renewable energy mandates same as a tax on the poor,” The Orange County Register (Opinion Section), July 26, 2015. Archived September 5, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pYOB7

  24. Robert Bryce. “The Poor Need More Energy: What BP Knows and Pope Francis Doesn’t,” National Review, June 22, 2015. Archived September 5, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/1n9ds

  25. Farron Cousins. “Republican Senators Push Manhattan Institute's Dirty Energy Propaganda Paper,” DeSmogBlog, September 16, 2014. 

  26. Timothy Cama. “Senators tackle energy cost impacts,” The Hill, September 12, 2014. Archived September 4, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CNtON

  27. Is Energy Insecurity on the Rise in America?” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, September 18, 2014. Archived October 31, 2014. Video no longer available.

  28. Contact Information,” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived September 5, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/q1tCO

  29. Diana Furchtgott-Roth. “Quebec tragedy reminds us pipelines are safest way to transport oil,” The Globe and Mail, July 7, 2013. archived September 5, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/2qOd9

  30. Kevin Grandia. “Shameful: Keystone XL Proponent Using Deadly Lac-Megantic, Quebec Oil Train Tragedy To Promote Pipeline,” DeSmogBlog, July 8, 2013. 

  31. Robert Bryce. “The Gas Is Greener,” The New York Times (Opinion Pages), June 7, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/DP8Pu

  32. Brendan DeMelle. “Manhattan Institute Op-ed Exemplifies Why NY Times Should Require Disclosure of Financial Conflicts,” DeSMogBlog, June 16, 2011.

  33. Robert Bryce. “America Needs the Shale Revolution,” The Wall Street Journal (Commentary Section), June 13, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/fftqP

  34. Tom Gray. “Fact check: Bryce stumbles on land use, sound, steel, benefits,” Into the Wind (The AWEA Blog), June 8, 2011. Archived June 12, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/QEN2a

  35. Stephen Lacey. “'Small IS Beautiful'! Robert Bryce Pushes Nuclear Power by Quoting Famous Author Who Called It 'an Ethical, Spiritual, and Metaphysical Monstrosity',” ThinkProgress, June 10,2 011. Archived September 5, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/r38Dv

  36. Brendan DeMelle. “Journalists Ask NYTimes To Set Disclosure of Conflicts Policy For Op-Ed Contributors,” DeSmogBlog, October 11, 2011.

  37. Myth 10,” Energy & the Environment Myths & Facts Second Edition, April, 2009. Archived September 4, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/3tteQ

  38. (Press Release) “New Report! Energy and the Environment: Myths and Facts Second Edition” (PDF), Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, April 20, 2009. Archived September 4, 2015. 

  39. Executive Summary,” Energy & the Environment Myths & Facts Second Edition, April, 2009. Archived September 4, 2015.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ESNQb

  40. Mitchell Anderson. “Bjorn Lomborg and the Anti-Climate Crowd,” DeSmogBlog, April 10, 2008.

  41. THEBOTTOMLESSWELL: The Twilight Of Fuel, The Virtue Of Waste, And Why We Will Never Run Out Of Energy,” Manhattan Institute. Archived September 5, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/gh8rw

  42. The Bottomless Well: How Energy Consumption Creates More Energy,” JunkScience.com, November 16, 2011. Archived January 4, 2012. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/RHs2R

  43. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research,” State Policy Network. Archived September 4, 2015. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/s6NEc

  44. Independent Task Force on Immigration and America's Future,” Migration Policy Institute. Archived September 4, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/4v8fx

  45. Manhattan Institute,” Conservative Transparency. Search performed May 3, 2016. 

  46. About,” Manhattan Institute. Archived May 4, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/hkNsd

  47. Who Is Robert Bryce?” Media Matters for America, October 7, 2011. Archived May 3, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/t9sET

  48. About: Board of Trustees,” Manhattan Institute. Archived May 3, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/vb7FA

  49. Experts,” Manhattan Institute. Archived May 3, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/TMM4f

  50. Robert Bryce. Power Hungry: The Myths of 'Green' Energy and the Real Fuels of the FuturePublicAffairs; First Edition edition (April 27, 2010). Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/6BsgV

  51. Robert Bryce. “Five Truths About Climate Change,” Wall Street Journal, October 6, 2011. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

  52. About: Staff Directory,” Manhattan Institute. Archived May 3, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/H0MSg

  53. Oren Cass. LEADINGNOWHERE: The Futility and Farce of Global Climate Negotiations” (PDF), Energy Policy & The Environment Report No. 19 (October, 2015). Manhatan Institute. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

  54. Oren Cass. “Leading Nowhere: The Futility and Frace of Global Climate Negotiations,” Manhattan Institute, October 16, 2016. Archived May 4, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/jp7tB

  55. Oren Cass. “Who Pays the Bill for the Obama Climate Agenda?” (PDF), the Manhattan Institute. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

  56. About,” Manhattan Institute. Archived May 29, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7D7hC

  57. Jonathan A. Lesser. “Missing Benefits, Hidden Costs: The Cloudy Numbers in the EPA's Proposed Clean Power Plan” (PDF), Manhattan Institute, June, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

  58. Robert Bryce,“What Happens to an Economy When Forced to Use Renewable Energy?” (PDF), The Manhattan Institute, May 4, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

  59. Bonner R. Cohen. “Study Shows the High Economic Costs of Renewable Energy,” Heartland Institute, June 14, 2016. Archived June 25, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/UPr4W

Other Resources


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 39

Trending Articles